I used to say "too bad" and require people to partake, but I have changed my tune on that as the years have gone on. If the reluctance is coming from a senior leader or someone in a major position, their lack of interest is usually a signal of larger fit issues and I try to address those rather than mandating participation.
But if it is a part-time person or someone in an ancillary role, I no longer force them to attend. Over the years, I have concluded that the negative energy they bring with their reluctance sucks the energy away from those excited about being there and in the end does more harm than good. I did not always feel that way, but I have come to peace with it and now believe it is best for the group overall.
I recently had this conversation with a colleague who has a new group of reports -- and someone who would rather remain on the fringes. "The fight isn't worth it," I told him. "I know it is counter to all the team building I preach, but it is true."
Two take aways for today: 1) Old dogs can learn new tricks. Leadership styles and how they are promulgated can/should/do evolve over time. 2) Think twice before you make something "mandatory." If someone chooses to pass on something, you may be better off without them than with their negative karma.
-- beth triplett
leadershipdots.blogspot.com
leadershipdots.blogspot.com
@leadershipdots
leadershipdots@gmail.com
leadershipdots@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment